品书网

杂志

保存到桌面 | 繁体 | 手机版
传记回忆文学理论侦探推理惊悚悬疑诗歌戏曲杂文随笔小故事书评杂志
品书网 > 杂志 > Is a Great Wall Sleepover A Good or Bad Idea?

Is a Great Wall Sleepover A Good or Bad Idea?

时间:2024-10-21 01:17:20

DearReaders,

ForumisacolumnthatprovidesaspaceforvaryingperspectivesoncontemporaryChinesesociety.Weinviteyoutosubmitpersonalviewpointsonpastandcurrenttopics(ineitherEnglishorChinese).

Pleaseprovideyournameandaddressalongwithyourcomments

Airbnb,ashort-stayrentalplatform,hasrecentlyscrappeditscontroversialplantoofferpeopleachancetospendanightinaroomitwasgoingtobuildontheGreatWallinBeijing.Thosewhowereinterestedinapplyingwereaskedtosubmitanarticleonovercomingculturalbarriersandfourwinnersweretobeselected.Byplanningthe鈥淣ightattheGreatWall,鈥滱irbnbclaimedthat鈥渙neofthegoalswastohighlighthoweveryonecanplayaroleinhonoringandpreservingthisincrediblepieceofworldhistory.鈥漇inceitsplanwouldnotimposefixedconstructionontheGreatWall,itsaiditdidnotthinktheeventwouldcauseanydamagetothewall.

However,theplanencounteredastrongbacklashfromtheChinesepublic,whoareworriedaboutthepotentialdamagethatanovernightstaymaycausetotheancientfortification.YanqingDistrict鈥檚culturalheritageprotectionauthorities,whichmanagetheBadalingsectionoftheGreatWallwheretheroomwastobebuilt,hadreportedlyneverbeenconsultedontheovernightstayorapprovedtheevent.Accordingtoastatement,theauthoritiesdidnotsupporttheprojectasitwasnotinlinewithculturalheritageprotectionprinciples.

Thepublic鈥檚criticismofAirbnb鈥檚sleepoverplanfocusesonitspotentialdamagetothewall,especiallybecauseitisnotanordinaryculturalheritagesitebutahistoricallandmarkrepresentingChinesecivilization.However,thereisalsoavoicesupportingtheactivity,whichbelievesthatAirbnb鈥檚plancouldhelpfurtherspreadtheGreatWall鈥檚reputationacrosstheworld.

Strengtheningregulations

LiZhenzhong(www.rednet.cn):Somepeopleareaskingwhyshouldn鈥檛thesleepoverbeheldattheGreatWall,sincethiskindofservicewillhelptouristsenjoyfamily-likewarmth.However,basiclivingfacilitiesrelatedtohomestayservicesattheGreatWallwillcauseirreversibledamagetoit.Forexample,heatingdeviceswilldoharmtotheGreatWall鈥檚stonesandtiles.Ifsocietyisignorantoflawsandregulationssurroundingculturalrelicprotection,suchharmfulbehaviorsmaybeforgiven.However,asculturalrelicprotectionisincreasinglybecomingasocialconsensus,it鈥檚unacceptabletoseepracticessuchasthe鈥淣ightattheGreatWall鈥漚sromanticandfashionable.

Inordertobetterprotectthewall,thefollowingmeasuresshouldbetaken.Firstly,relevantlawsandregulationsshouldbestrengthenedsothatindividualsorenterprisesareforbiddenfromofferinghomestayservicesattheGreatWall.Secondly,relevantauthoritiesshouldnotjustmakeoralexplanationabouttheimportanceofprotectingculturalrelics,buttheyshouldalsotakejointactionstostopallkindsofillegalactivitiesthatcausedamagetoculturalrelics.Withoutspecificmeasuresorplans,itisimpossibletopreventillegalactionswhichcoulddestroytheGreatWall.

HeYonghai(XiaoxiangMorningPost):Airbnb鈥檚plantoprovideovernightstayservicesattheGreatWallhassparkedcontroversy.

Somethinkitiscreative.However,I鈥檓afraidthatthisactionmaydestroythishistoricalsite.Theorganizersclaimedthatnothingonthewallwouldbedamagedduringthewholeactivity.Ifso,howcantheybuildaroomforaccommodations?Accordingtoreports,abeacontowerattheGreatWallwastoberenovatedintoahousewithabigbed,lampsandatoilet.ThefactcontradictstheclaimthathomestayserviceswillbeprovidedwithoutinstallingfixedfacilitiesorruiningtheappearanceoftheGreatWall.

IntheRegulationsontheProtectionoftheGreatWall,theinstallationoffacilitiesandequipmentunrelatedtotheprotectionoftheGreatWallisprohibited.Theseguidelinesshouldbeobservedbyallorganizationsandindividuals.Remodelingabeacontowerintoahouseviolatestheseregulations.Ifanordinarytouristdaredtodosuchathing,thehousewouldbeimmediatelytorndown.

Businessesarealwaysdrivenbythepursuitoftheirowninterests.Byrecruitingpeopletowinahomestaytravel,Airbnbwastryingtohypeitsprogramandfurtheritsreputation.Thiskindofactivityshouldnotbeadvocated.

Airbnbrespondedbysayingthat鈥減rotectingculturalrelicsandheritageistheoriginalintentionofouractivities,鈥漚nd鈥渨ehopetoshowtheworldthearchitecturalandculturalcharmoftheGreatWallandatthesametimeprotecttheculturalheritageoftheGreatWall.鈥漈hewaytotangiblyprotectculturalrelicsistonotbotherthem.TheGreatWallisalreadywell-knownaroundtheworld,eitherforitsarchitecturalstyleoritscultureandhistory.HowmuchculturalcharmcantheintrusiveactivityofhomestayservicesaddtotheGreatWall?

XuZhongju(www.cnhubei):TheGreatWallisoneoftheculturalsymbolsoftheChinesenation.ItisevidenceofChina鈥檚thousandsofyearsofhistoricalchanges.Itembodiesthecommonmemoryofthenationandisatreasureofhumankind.Therefore,theGreatWallshouldneverbecomeatoolforanyenterpriseorindividualtomakeaprofit.Theso-calledhomestayserviceisblasphemyagainstChinesecultureandwilldodamagetothishistoricalheritagesite.

Theproposed鈥淣ightattheGreatWall鈥漞venthassetabadprecedent.Ifthistrendisnoteffectivelycurbed,morebusinessesareexpectedtofollowsuitandcausegreaterharmtoancientarchitectureacrossthecountry.Fivethousandyearsofhistoryhaveleftalotofvaluableculturaltreasuresandsomeofthemarebeingtakenadvantageofbybusinessestoimprovetheirprofits,reputationorboth.

Inrecentyears,asaresultofmushroomingself-promotionalmediaandshortvideoplatforms,homestayservicesrelatedtoorhypedbyInternetcelebritiesareridingthetide.HomestayserviceslikethisproposedAirbnbeventwillnothelpprotectChina鈥檚culturalrelicsbutinsteadwillbringhugedamagetothem.Allkindsofgarbagepro-ducedbytheconstructionofsuchlodgingsandaccommodationsisboundtocauseconsiderabledamagetoculturalrelics,whichisthelastthingwewanttosee.

Therearenumerouswaystoprotecttraditionalculture,explorethemeaningofitandexpandpeople鈥檚understandingofit.Activitiesformakingprofitsundertheguiseofprotectinghistoricalrelicsshouldbebanned.ThesleepoverattheGreatWallisinherentlyameanstomakeexorbitantprofits,ratherthananattempttoprotectculturalrelics.

LISHIGONG

Spreadingtheculture

DongYaohui(www.huanqiu):Whenprotectivemeasuresareinstalled,activitiessuchashomestayserviceswillnothurttheGreatWall,neitherthestructureitselfnorrelatedcultureandhistory.Scenicspotsarebuiltordesignedtobeexperiencedbytravelers.InthecaseofthehomestayserviceattheGreatWall,itfocusesontravelers鈥檈xperienceintheevening.TheGreatWalldoesnotgetdamagedbecausevisitorsstandonitlookingatthesun,sowhydopeoplethinkitwillgetdamagedjustbecausevisitorsstaythereappreciatingthestarsintheevening?TheGreatWallisseenasasymbolofChinesecivilization,butstilltravelersareallowedtowalkonitaslongastheypaytodoso.WeshouldnotrejectcommercialprogramsattheGreatWallwiththeexcuseofprotectinghistoricalandculturalheritage.

WehopethatmorepeoplewillgettoknowabouttheGreatWallandChineseculture.TheGreatWallwasamilitarydefenseproject,butnowadays,itismoreofasymbolofpeace.Ifprotectionistheonlypriority,notasingletravelershouldbeallowedontotheGreatWall.Thereshouldbenomovieshooting,noculturalorentertainmentactivitiesattheGreatWallatall.

Everyyear,theGreatWallreceivesmillionsofvisitors.Aslongasprecautionaryworkiswell-prepared,activitiesdesignedtospreadtheGreatWallcultureshouldbeadvocated.

CopyeditedbyRebecaToledo
   

热门书籍

热门文章